Menu
Middle East - Israel–Hamas War Origins Historical Causes Triggers

Middle East — Israel–Hamas War Origins: Historical Causes & Triggers

Facts & Timeline

  • Partition & creation of Israel (1947–1948): The United Nations adopted Resolution 181 in 1947 to partition the British Mandate of Palestine into separate Jewish and Arab states. When Israel declared independence on May 14, 1948, neighboring Arab states immediately attacked. This led to the first Arab–Israeli war and the displacement of hundreds of thousands of Palestinians. Council on Foreign Relations

  • Territorial changes & occupation: In the 1967 Six-Day War, Israel captured the West Bank, East Jerusalem, Gaza Strip, Sinai Peninsula, and Golan Heights. Israeli occupation of Palestinian territories began, fueling long-term tensions. Encyclopedia Britannica

  • Rise of Hamas (1987): Amid the First Intifada (uprising), Hamas formally emerged in December 1987 under Sheikh Ahmed Yassin. It combined Islamist ideology with Palestinian nationalism, opposing the more secular PLO and rejecting Israel’s legitimacy. Al Jazeera

  • Gaza takeover and blockade (2007): After winning the 2006 Palestinian legislative election, Hamas forcibly took control of Gaza from Fatah in 2007. In response, Israel and Egypt imposed a blockade on Gaza, restricting movement of goods and people. Wikipedia

  • Cycles of warfare: Since then, repeated conflicts have flared (2008, 2012, 2014, 2021), each rooted in rocket fire, military raids, blockade tensions, and failure of diplomacy. Encyclopedia Britannica

  • Trigger: October 7, 2023 attack: Hamas launched a large-scale assault from Gaza into Israel—by land, air, and sea—killing over 1,200 Israelis (military and civilian) and abducting about 250 hostages. Among those targeted were concert-goers at the Nova music festival, where hundreds were killed or taken captive, with reports of sexual violence, executions, and other atrocities. (congress.gov, bbc.com)

Current Situation

  • Failed deterrence & escalation: Before October 2023, Israel often relied on targeted operations, airstrikes, and occasional incursions to deter militant groups. But Hamas and allied groups adapted via tunnels, rockets of longer range, and hybrid tactics. The 2023 attack exposed gaps in Israeli intelligence and border defense. Wikipedia

  • Deep grievances & existential rhetoric: Among Palestinians, decades of occupation, settlement expansion, restrictions on movement, economic hardship, and lack of political sovereignty hardened hostilities. Hamas deployed narratives of resistance, martyrdom, and rejection of Israeli legitimacy. Amnesty

  • International dynamics: Iran, Qatar, Turkey, the U.S., Egypt, and others have long played roles—funding, mediation, arms supply, diplomatic support—all influencing the balance of power. Congress.gov

  • Collapse of peace process: Earlier frameworks like the Oslo Accords stalled; trust eroded. Hamas rejected some peace overtures, seeing them as compromises that failed to deliver rights or end occupation. Encyclopedia Britannica

Motivations & Analysis

This war was not a sudden anomaly but the culmination of unresolved, deep structural conflicts: land, identity, sovereignty, security, and dignity. Each side views the other not just as an adversary but as an existential threat.

Israel’s motivations include: ensuring security, eliminating what it perceives as a strategic threat, restoring deterrence, and asserting sovereign control over its borders. Hamas’s motivations include: resisting occupation, mobilizing its base via armed struggle, reclaiming territory or recognition, and surviving against overwhelming power.

The escalation from long-standing grievances to full-scale war also reveals flawed deterrence logic. When punishment fails, incentives for preemption grow. Israel’s heavy-handed tactics at times fuel resentment and recruitment for extremist actors. Meanwhile, entrenched desperation in Gaza—compounded by blockade and poor governance—makes population control, resistance, and civilian suffering part of the war calculus.

From a strategic viewpoint, the October 7 attack shattered assumptions on both sides: Israel’s military superiority did not guarantee invulnerability; Hamas’s asymmetric tactics highlighted vulnerabilities in modern states. It also expanded the theater—war beyond borders, diplomatic clashes, propaganda battles, humanitarian disaster zones, and global polarization.

Scriptural Perspective & Hope

Conflict and suffering echo the brokenness of human systems. Jesus foretold as part of the “sign of the times” that “nation will rise against nation and kingdom against kingdom.” (Matthew 24:3, 24:7) The violence we see between Israel and Hamas is one expression of that prophecy — wars fueled by history, fear, and human imperfection.

But God promises a very different future. Through the prophet Micah, He assured us of a time when His true worship would fill the earth and “nation will not lift up sword against nation, neither will they learn war anymore.” Instead, people will “sit, each one under his vine and under his fig tree, and no one will make them afraid.” (Micah 4:1–4)

This is the promised rule of the Messiah — or Mashiach — a hope cherished by both Christians and Jews. Under his Kingdom, peace will no longer be fragile or temporary, but secure and enduring for all peoples.

Related Posts