Deportations Without Due Process
Key Facts & Recent Cases
-
In U.S. immigration law, persons facing deportation do not have a guaranteed right to court-appointed counsel in most cases, because immigration courts are civil, not criminal. (Vera Institute)
-
As of May 2025 in Kansas City, only 23.4% of immigrants, including unaccompanied children, had an attorney when ordered removed. (Missouri Independent)
-
The Trump administration has stripped Temporary Protected Status (TPS) from nearly 1 million people, making many lawful residents suddenly removable. (American Immigration Council)
-
In March 2025, the U.S. deported 238 Venezuelans to El Salvador; they were jailed in a facility (CECOT) without trial or fixed terms. Many had no criminal conviction. (Wikipedia: March 2025 American deportations of Venezuelans)
-
Kilmar Abrego Garcia: deported on March 15, 2025, by “error” despite never being charged; his U.S. wife and children forced to litigate his return. (Wikipedia: Deportation of Kilmar Abrego Garcia)
-
The Alien Enemies Act (1798) has been revived in 2025 in some deportation actions — allowing removal of certain individuals without customary due process. (Modi Law Firm blog)
-
Expedited removal rules allow the government to deport certain undocumented people quickly, bypassing a judge or full hearing. (Nafsa.org)
Context, Mechanisms & Impact
The U.S. legal system treats deportation proceedings as civil court, not criminal, meaning that constitutional protections (like guaranteed representation) are limited. Deportees often face a government attorney but must defend themselves. (Vera Institute)
Because representation is disconnected and underfunded, many immigrants are deported without understanding their rights. In some jurisdictions, only a minority secure attorneys—meaning they go to hearings unprepared, increasing likelihood of removal.
The removal process has become more aggressive: expansion of expedited removal, use of the Alien Enemies Act, and large-scale revocation of legal protections (like TPS). These changes make it easier for lawful but vulnerable residents to be deported without thorough review.
In some notable cases, U.S. citizens or lawful residents are impacted — such as Mahmoud Khalil, a student and legal resident whose visa was revoked in 2025, and he was detained and targeted for deportation despite no criminal record. (Wikipedia: Detention of Mahmoud Khalil)
These practices raise serious questions about fairness, transparency, and whether a nation that professes justice can legally exile people without the protections owed to them.
Scriptural Perspective
God’s law commands justice and fair treatment. Isaiah 61:8 opens with “I, Jehovah, love justice.” To remove legal representation and deport people without due process is contrary to that heart.
In Leviticus 19:33–34, God required Israelites not to mistreat strangers, but to treat them as natives and to love them as themselves. When we strip away rights from the vulnerable, we violate that command.
Deuteronomy 27:19 warns: “Cursed is anyone who withholds justice from the foreigner, the fatherless or the widow.” Deporting those who rely on the system and withholding their chance for defense is a modern echo of that curse.
Yet the Bible also promises a future when God’s Kingdom will exercise perfect justice, where wrongs are righted, and oppression, wrongful punishment, or forced exile will be no more.
